|
YESUS
KRISTOS |
|
|
|
DIVINE
SAVIOUR |
|
PERSPECTIVE |
| The
CRC
combines the insight of RASTAFARI
and
CHRISTIANITY
on the Babylonian Anti-Christ. |
|
INTERACTION |
| Share your thoughts and
participate to this website by submitting articles or stating
your opinnion. |
| Log
in the Dubroom Communication Headquarters when you want to
participate. |
|
LOG
IN
|
|
SUBMIT
ARTICLE
|
|
MAILING
LIST
|
|
REGISTER
|
|
|
|
|
CRC
CHECK: "CHRISTAFARI™"
|
|
|
|
Lion of Zion, Church Growth
Connection, Anti Rasta
|
What kind of view does the Christafari Cult (and with
that, the Christian Industrial Complex) have on Rasta,
and why? And how do they perpetuate their purpose-driven
mission trip?
One of the ways is by publications such as the one
quoted in the posting that started this thread.
We see in it, how it seems that "Jah" is
considered to be a three letter word which can be used
in some marketing and sales technique. In one group it
is "profitable" to "use" the
"term", where in other groups it may
"lead people to wrong impressions" to
"use" the very same "term".
This is best seen in the following quote:
"My opinion is that it is not your use of Jah
that matters, rather, it is who you think that Jah is
when you say His name. In other words, it is not the
Biblical name that you use that counts, so much as it is
the person whom you believe bears that name. However,
I would never recommend for a Christian in Jamaica to
constantly use the name Jah amongst Rastas while dancing
with fancy footwork around whom they believe Jah is.
They are setting themselves up to be misinterpreted.
This will only lead to confusion. On the other hand, I
would endorse someone who uses this appellation to
gain entrance and respect among a group and then
further clarified that the one they are speaking of is
Jesus Christ."
The word "however" in the previous paragraph
marks a crossing of a border which can not be crossed.
The word "however", namely, masks the start of
a serious revelation of the mind set that caused the
christafari cult to come into existance.
In this cult, you can use the admitted biblical NAME OF
THE MOST HIGH (not a "term", as the
Christafarian calls it) to admittedly GAIN ENTRANCE AND
RESPECT in order to MAKE THEM CHRISTAFARIANS!
This is what they do, their working method called
"all things to all men". "Look like a
Rasta to tell the Rasta he is wrong". Now this
theatre apprearantly run a bit out of the control of
mark mohr and/or the christafari cult head quarters
supreme court, as he now (note the word HOWEVER, which
is not explained or founded but simply stated to
introduce a false teaching) says "you can look like
a Rasta, just don't say Jah".
Appearantly, according to the Christafari Cult Paulus
made a mistake when he said "all thing to all
men" in Corinth. Mark Mohr corrects Paulus and
says: "you can't be all things to all men, because
you can not use the biblical name for the Creator while
you are on the christafarian mission trip." A
mission trip, by the way, that looks like this: being
among people you want to convert into christafarians by
looking like a "rasta".
Is it respectfull to Rastafari, to Jah Rastafari and to
the movement that is called after the Head Creator, to
state the following about the Rastaman's chant to JAH
RASTAFARI?
Read this:
However, we must remember that it was God's name
first, long before Haile Selassie ever walked the earth.
By this time we should realize that it is standard
procedure for Satan to take scriptures from the
Bible and twist them towards darkness. If you recall,
when Jesus was in the desert fasting for forty days, he
was tempted by Satan who misquoted the scriptures to fit
his own purpose. We see this revealed in virtually every
cult in existence today. The enemy puts some truth in
every lie. Lucifer usually builds his foundation on one
or more biblical truths that have been taken out of
context.
Since Rastafarians use the name Jah does this mean that
Christians should never use it again? Let me answer this
question by posing yet two other questions. Since
Jehovah Witnesses seem to have taken over the name
Jehovah should Christians no longer use this
appellation?
Now what does this tell you? Yes, isn't it a perfect
description of Satan's methods and the way the cults
work? Isn't this a perfect description of the
Christafari Cult itself?
While they admit here, too, how they believe the
Ethiopian Emperor to be JAH (NOT GOD), they still want
to fight down Rasta.
It has been sufficiently documentated how the
Christafari Cult twists Scriptures for their own
darkness. To cover up what they are truly doing, in the
name of some "geezus".
But remember, while all the Christafarians are vexed at
those who call their CULT for what it is, a CULT
centered around A FALSE GOSPEL and a FALSE GOD or IDOL,
they themselves do not even realize how they are doing
what they judge the Rastaman of.
They have no problem in trying to silence everyone who
critisizes the Christafari Cult, even twisting
scriptures to create darkness (is absence of light,
therefore a perfect situation for the forces of evil to
do their dirty work) as they continually try to do even
on this forum.
They have no problem in speaking about the NAME of the
MOST HIGH, of Which He says that He leads us for HIS
NAME'S SAKE (psalm 23 etc etc etc) as a "term"
to be "applied" to "gain entrance and
respect"! And they make a good dollar doing it,
too! And if they're not, they will. After all, that's
their "purpose" "plug the gap in the
christian industry".
Because, after these people get converted from Jah
Rastafari to Christafarianism, they are told:
Christ alone is the Lord of my life. So when I listen
to a reggae song that praises Rastafari, giving worship
to Selassie, I get convicted. My spirit does not agree
with this. I then have to ask myself this question: if
Shadrach, and his brothers refused to bow to the false
god when the music played, why would they then go out
and buy a CD full of this same music and listen to it
daily? They wouldn't!
Now, how can it be, that the Christafari Cult has no
problem in seeing "christianity" as a
"product" which you must "sell" for
money, using manipulative techniques and even
plasphemies?
Because, for Christafari, the Lord's Prayer starts with
"Father in Heave, HOLLOWED be thy NAME JAH".
Because, what they do is "Use the Name Of JAH in
VAIN". His Name, in the Christafari cult, is a
"term".
To realize why they are so industrialized, you don't
have to be a deep researcher. You see them speaking
about "the christian industry" themselves, you
see them comparing this industrial complex with old
Testament Israel and the New Testament Church.
You see them comparing their Christianity with a man
called "Yonghi Cho" from Korea. This man is a
heretic. He is one of the founders or perpetuators of
the "prosperity gospel".
Here are some websites about this man:
- LINK
1
- LINK
2
- LINK
3
The Christafari Cult is a part of this Christian
Industrial Complex. the connections are all over the
place. The christianity that the Christian Industrial
Complex stands for is the very same christianity that
has blessed the SLAVERY and has blessed the KILLINGS of
IRAQ.
And the above is just a little part of the
"puzzle"....
|
From, the Christafari website, the following quotes:
QUOTE:
I am not saying that from this day forth we should only
call God Jah. For despite how adamant I am on this
subject, I rarely ever use the name Jah in my daily
speech. This name is only uttered when I am ministering
specifically to a rastafarian. I simply believe that
there are many names for God in the Bible, and that we
should not limit ourselves to only one or two. For
example, when you are in need, call upon Jehovah-Jireh
your provider. When you are lacking peace in your life,
remember that he is Jehovah-Shalom (Jehovah is peace).
These names and many others can minister to the hearts
of believers.
With all of this in mind, many parishioners still do not
feel comfortable using the term Jah for God. In fact
many would like to completely strike it from their
vocabulary due to its present day inference to
Rastafari. I completely understand their position.
However, we must remember that it was God's name first,
long before Haile Selassie ever walked the earth. By
this time we should realize that it is standard
procedure for Satan to take scriptures from the Bible
and twist them towards darkness. If you recall, when
Jesus was in the desert fasting for forty days, he was
tempted by Satan who misquoted the scriptures to fit his
own purpose. We see this revealed in virtually every
cult in existence today. The enemy puts some truth in
every lie. Lucifer usually builds his foundation on one
or more biblical truths that have been taken out of
context.
Since Rastafarians use the name Jah does this mean that
Christians should never use it again? Let me answer this
question by posing yet two other questions. Since
Jehovah Witnesses seem to have taken over the name
Jehovah should Christians no longer use this
appellation? Furthermore, should we abandon the name of
our Messiah because Mormons have taken his name and used
it in the title of their church; "The Church of
Jesus Christ and the Latter Day Saints"?
Absolutely not! Rather, we should stand up for the truth
with our feet firmly planted in the solid foundation of
the Word of God.
My opinion is that it is not your use of Jah that
matters, rather, it is who you think that Jah is when
you say His name. In other words, it is not the Biblical
name that you use that counts, so much as it is the
person whom you believe bears that name. However, I
would never recommend for a Christian in Jamaica to
constantly use the name Jah amongst Rastas while dancing
with fancy footwork around whom they believe Jah is.
They are setting themselves up to be misinterpreted.
This will only lead to confusion. On the other hand, I
would endorse someone who uses this appellation to gain
entrance and respect among a group and then further
clarified that the one they are speaking of is Jesus
Christ.
I think that one of the greatest strengths that we have
is the ability to take those names and doctrines that we
have in common with other cults and to use them as a
gateway for ministering to others on their own ground
using their own language.
A great example of the ministry opportunities that could
be possible if the use of Jah was put in place by
Christians when trying to reach rastas is the story of
the tremendous church growth in Korea. In the 1860s,
Roman Catholics had faced great hostility in Korea for
using an imported Chinese term for God. This did not sit
well with the Korean nationals, and church attendance
was at an all time low. In contrast, Protestant
missionary work to Korea began in earnest in the 1880s,
and almost immediately there was a receptive response.
One of the reasons for this may have been the
Protestants use of the Korean term Hananim for God. The
Choice of Hananim according to Don Richardson, could not
have been more providential for Protestant missions in
Korea. Preaching like houses afire in cities, towns,
villages or in the countryside, Protestants missionaries
began by affirming Korean Belief in Hananim. Building
upon this residual witness, Protestants masterfully
disarmed the Korean people's natural antipathy toward
bowing before some foreign deity.
This event set the stage for the fastest church growth
ever recorded. Led by Paul Yonggi Cho and his cell-group
concept, an estimated one million people are being
converted to Christianity each year in Korea. I truly
believe that what has happened in Korea could happen in
Jamaica with the redeemed use of the name Jah when
ministering to rastas. Furthermore, we have a greater
justification if we use an already Biblical name to
reach this culture.
If you wish to discuss this topic, please visit our
FORUM.
ORIGINAL
URL
Admin
Administrator
Joined: 04 Nov 2001
Posts: 265
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2004 7:57 pm Post
subject: Conduct and forum terms of use
Greetings all,
As a reminder, the staff and volunteers of Lion of Zion
have absolute right to terminate any user or delete
content as they see fit.
Use of this forum in no way grants you the right to
freedom of speech, and is no guarantee that your posts
will be viewed. All content is subject to review.
Lion of Zion Entertainment is a private organization and
as such has complete rights to any content posted on
this site, as well as authority to delegate control of
this content to others. We may edit, delete, reprint or
use this content in any way for our purpose.
If we, our administrator, our moderators or any of our
loyal users feel a post to be in bad taste, disruptive
or in a spirit that contradicts our mission we WILL
terminate the post, the user, and the connection.
We do our best to abide by the terms we are bound to by
our host and their providers.
We in no way advocate the posts of any individual.
Everyone who participates in this forum has submitted
themselves to these terms.
ORIGINAL
URL
|
|
POSTED: April 15th, 2005, 4:21am
|
|
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is posted without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. The
CRC has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
the articles nor is The CRC endorsed or sponsored by the
originator.
|
|
PRINT,
SEND OR REPLY |
|
|
|
|
|
HAILE
SELASSIE |
|
|
|
IKON
OF CHRIST |
|
PERSPECTIVE |
|
The
CRC
combines the insight of RASTAFARI
and
CHRISTIANITY
on the Babylonian Anti-Christ.
|
|
DISCLAIMER |
|
The
opinnions expressed in the link(s) below are not neccesarily
the opinnions of the CRC.
|
|
|
|
